What caught my eye
The site presents frontend work through an experimental, deliberately distorted text treatment. During inspection, the opening displayed an offline message and scrambled headings.
What works well
There are hints of an individual visual voice, but the unstable opening makes it hard to assess the projects reliably.
My recommendation
If you visit, try the projects section and see whether the text settles into a readable state. I wouldn't make a firm quality judgment from the opening screen alone.
Try the projects sectionReview method +
- Role clarity 15
- Work and case-study evidence 20
- Contribution and decisions 20
- Outcomes and credibility 15
- Visual craft and originality 20
- Usability and technical finish 10
These notes focus mainly on desktop presentation and the evidence visible to a visitor. Creator-reported metrics are not independently verified. This is not a complete mobile, accessibility or performance audit.